...with new ones of their own (eg for aggregation). The software will include features for [[debate]], an important part of investigating the truth of contentious
...
3 KB (560 words) - 13:54, 26 March 2026
...o work on X. Other users would join and begin collaborating. Our [[trust]] features can be used to filter out those who don't meet certain criteria or only all
Some key features of community building tools include:
...
12 KB (1,925 words) - 15:35, 9 October 2024
...cial product (geared to students) which provides standard argument mapping features. Its main advantage appears to be ease of use and a plentiful array of argu
From the ideas presented above, let’s brainstorm some argument mapping features that might be useful in our trust network:
...
13 KB (2,152 words) - 19:29, 26 September 2024
<h2>Needed User Input Features</h2>
...
7 KB (969 words) - 13:41, 2 October 2024
...ve [https://libraryguides.mdc.edu/c.php?g=618107&p=4301084 educational features] to help people from getting trapped in their own bias.
...
10 KB (1,673 words) - 21:30, 20 September 2024
...debate which anyone can take part in. The [[Community|community]] building features could be used to include anyone who wanted to take part in government, pres
...
14 KB (2,286 words) - 14:47, 1 October 2024
...ebater website provides a demo page where users can try out several of the features present through the API. The API can perform a number of tasks related to a
...
17 KB (2,540 words) - 16:29, 8 September 2024
...em could even have political parties through its [[community]] involvement features. With enough participation our software will reach a critical point where,
...
22 KB (3,653 words) - 14:31, 1 October 2024
...ort not having read a sub-argument that they have, in fact, read. Tracking features could, in theory, be developed to check whether this is the case and react
...
46 KB (7,416 words) - 21:03, 26 September 2024