More actions
13 September 2024
- 18:2918:29, 13 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:Brainstorming 24 No edit summary
- 18:2918:29, 13 September 2024 diff hist +4,522 N Contract as a method to mitigate the basic liberties imposition Created page with "{{Main|Political Systems}} There is a natural conflict between community needs and individual basic liberties. Sometimes, under exigent circumstances, the community will have to impose on its members to the point of taking away their basic liberties. In extreme cases this might include their life. One way to ameliorate this problem is to have a contract upon admission to the community in which the prospective member agrees in advance to these impositions. If the membe..."
- 18:2718:27, 13 September 2024 diff hist +1 Political systems No edit summary
- 18:2718:27, 13 September 2024 diff hist +272 Political systems No edit summary
- 15:5215:52, 13 September 2024 diff hist +25 Defining utopia No edit summary
- 15:5115:51, 13 September 2024 diff hist −88 Defining utopia No edit summary
- 15:5015:50, 13 September 2024 diff hist +82 Ratings system No edit summary
- 15:4715:47, 13 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/A Moneyless Economy Based on Reputation and Need No edit summary
- 15:4615:46, 13 September 2024 diff hist +2,776 N Defining utopia Created page with "{{Main|Political Systems}} Dan mentioned at one point, somewhat tongue in cheek, that we are designing utopia. But what is our definition of utopia? I think it would be a good idea to have folks describe their thoughts on this. Mine are below. Utopia permits personal freedom of choice, expression, and action. The only constraints on these involve interactions and effects on others. Utopia, mostly through personal choice and consensus, distributes its wealth equitably...."
- 15:4515:45, 13 September 2024 diff hist +157 Political systems No edit summary
- 15:3515:35, 13 September 2024 diff hist +28 Optimal income distribution No edit summary
- 15:3315:33, 13 September 2024 diff hist −51 Political systems No edit summary
- 15:3115:31, 13 September 2024 diff hist +83 Political systems No edit summary
- 15:2815:28, 13 September 2024 diff hist +83 Power distribution as a corollary to income distribution No edit summary
- 15:2215:22, 13 September 2024 diff hist +40 Optimal income distribution No edit summary
- 15:1915:19, 13 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Optimizing Society: Power, Income, and Ratings in a Voluntary Community No edit summary
- 15:1415:14, 13 September 2024 diff hist −1 Democratizing resource allocation No edit summary
- 15:0915:09, 13 September 2024 diff hist +7,686 N Power distribution as a corollary to income distribution Created page with "{{Main|Political Systems}} In our society, the distribution of power is as important, if not more so, than the distribution of income. In fact, one reason we are concerned about the distribution of income is because it profoundly affects how power is distributed. We have discussed ways our ratings-based society might choose to change the distribution of income. This is fairly easy becau..."
- 14:2714:27, 13 September 2024 diff hist +223 Political systems No edit summary
- 14:1314:13, 13 September 2024 diff hist −70 Democratizing resource allocation No edit summary
- 14:0914:09, 13 September 2024 diff hist +27 Democratizing resource allocation No edit summary
- 14:0814:08, 13 September 2024 diff hist +137 Economic systems No edit summary
- 14:0514:05, 13 September 2024 diff hist +3,545 N Democratizing resource allocation Created page with "{{Main|Societal optimization}} One of the primary benefits of a system like ours will be in improved resource allocation. Current resource allocation systems (eg regulated market capitalism) wastes a tremendous amount of wealth on unnecessary labor and goods. Furthermore, we distribute wealth in counterproductive and undemocratic ways. We underpay manual workers, overpay managers, maintain positions in which no actual work is accomplished, create make-work projects, spe..."
- 14:0414:04, 13 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Democratizing Decision Making: A Predicate Based Rating System for Virtual Communities No edit summary
- 14:0314:03, 13 September 2024 diff hist +121 Societal optimization No edit summary
- 13:5313:53, 13 September 2024 diff hist +53 Ratings system No edit summary
12 September 2024
- 21:2421:24, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Democratizing Decision Making: A Predicate Based Rating System for Virtual Communities No edit summary
- 21:2421:24, 12 September 2024 diff hist +1,894 N Steps in policy-making Created page with "{{Main|The subjective and community ratings system}} Policies are plans of action and guidelines for solving problems. They are not necessarily specific solutions to individual problems although they can result in that when implemented. They are usually not quite as general as a mission statement (which often conveys no meaning) but they don’t always tell you “how” to do anything in particular. They just guide you in a direction, eg Our policy is to promote human..."
- 21:2221:22, 12 September 2024 diff hist +27 The subjective and community ratings system No edit summary
- 21:1221:12, 12 September 2024 diff hist −13 Political systems No edit summary
- 21:1221:12, 12 September 2024 diff hist 0 Political systems No edit summary
- 21:1221:12, 12 September 2024 diff hist +44 Political systems No edit summary
- 21:0821:08, 12 September 2024 diff hist −5 Justice and defense in communities No edit summary
- 21:0621:06, 12 September 2024 diff hist +21,299 N Justice and defense in communities Created page with "{{Main|Ratings system}} ==Thoughts on justice== It is not a happy thought but there is and will be criminal behavior in all societies. Our idea is that the ratings system will temper this to a large extent since it wouldn’t be possible to “get away” with alot of bad behavior. The criminal would be exposed to more than just a supportive friend-group. It is also the case that people with a tendency toward bad behavior might be more easily identified early-on throug..."
- 21:0621:06, 12 September 2024 diff hist +8 Internal:FromGitlab/Ratings Based Society: Economics, Justice, and Defense No edit summary
- 21:0321:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist −6 Community →Steps in Community Building
- 21:0221:02, 12 September 2024 diff hist +66 Community No edit summary
- 20:5820:58, 12 September 2024 diff hist −6,784 Community No edit summary
- 20:3920:39, 12 September 2024 diff hist +145 Economic losses and counterfactuals No edit summary
- 20:3320:33, 12 September 2024 diff hist +228 Economic systems No edit summary
- 20:2720:27, 12 September 2024 diff hist −1 Economic losses and counterfactuals No edit summary
- 20:2520:25, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Balancing Trust and Liberty: The Future of Ratings Systems No edit summary
- 20:2520:25, 12 September 2024 diff hist 0 Economic losses and counterfactuals No edit summary
- 20:2520:25, 12 September 2024 diff hist +3,936 N Economic losses and counterfactuals Created page with "{{Main|Economic systems}} {{Main|Systems thinking}} $5.9 billion is a lot of money but probably no one actually “felt” the loss. This is usually the case with financial fraud. If someone robs our bank, we do not personally feel the effect of that. For one thing, the FDIC insures our accounts so the loss is only felt collectively. But another problem, obviously, is that much of what counts as a loss is only measurable in the future. In other words, the loss is the d..."
- 20:2320:23, 12 September 2024 diff hist +154 System modeling No edit summary
- 20:1520:15, 12 September 2024 diff hist +48 Economic systems No edit summary
- 20:0920:09, 12 September 2024 diff hist −98 Weight assignment -- The equal weight method No edit summary
- 20:0320:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Revolutionizing Governance through Continuous Rating and Trust Networks No edit summary
- 20:0320:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist +5,364 N Weight assignment -- The equal weight method Created page with "{{Main|Ratings system}} In our last meeting (7/3/2024) we discussed methods for delegating trust weights. Dan’s preferred system is to give everyone 100 points to dole out as they see fit. You can spend points on other people and accumulate points spent on you from other people. One question that came up is whether you could spend the points you were given by others. The consensus seemed to be that yes, you could. If you accumulated say, 500 points, you could proxy it..."
- 20:0220:02, 12 September 2024 diff hist +193 Ratings system No edit summary