More actions
8 September 2024
- 21:1721:17, 8 September 2024 diff hist +172 The ratings system in light of our current institutional failures No edit summary current
- 21:1421:14, 8 September 2024 diff hist +69 The ratings system in light of our current institutional failures No edit summary
- 21:1221:12, 8 September 2024 diff hist +190 The ratings system in light of our current institutional failures No edit summary
- 21:0321:03, 8 September 2024 diff hist +128 The ratings system in light of our current institutional failures No edit summary
- 21:0121:01, 8 September 2024 diff hist +6 The ratings system in light of our current institutional failures No edit summary
- 21:0121:01, 8 September 2024 diff hist +536 The ratings system in light of our current institutional failures No edit summary
- 20:4420:44, 8 September 2024 diff hist +2,803 N The ratings system in light of our current institutional failures Created page with "{{Main|Ratings system}} Recent and past supreme court decisions are an important reason we are constructing the ratings system. Over time we have realized that the courts, rather than objectively assessing the law, are in fact biased. Our present system of checks and balances, one that was <i>deliberately designed into the system</i>, is breaking down. What better way to prevent this outcome than to have a continuous check, by the people, on institutions using technolog..."
- 20:4420:44, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Revolutionizing Governance through Continuous Rating and Trust Networks No edit summary
- 20:4220:42, 8 September 2024 diff hist −48 Ratings system No edit summary
- 20:0220:02, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Balancing Privacy, Transparency, and Hysteresis in a Ratings Based Society No edit summary
- 20:0220:02, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4,882 N Hysteresis Created page with "{{Main|System modeling}} We have identified hysteresis as a necessary component of social systems, as it certainly is in natural systems. Generally speaking we want our ratings system, and associated decision-making systems, to not fluctuate wildly in their output. We especially want to prevent rapid fluctuations in policy based on the whims of the moment. So we’d like to build some hysteresis into these systems and understand any hysteresis that’s already built-in..."
- 20:0020:00, 8 September 2024 diff hist +26 Software for social and economics modeling No edit summary current
- 20:0020:00, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Optimizing Society: Power, Income, and Ratings in a Voluntary Community No edit summary
- 19:5919:59, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4,806 N Software for social and economics modeling Created page with "We’ve discussed the need for systems thinking and optimization at the societal level. Our argument has been that an objective, rigorous approach to problems will both improve public policy and quiet partisan discord. Community members will literally have to become knowledgeable about modeling social systems. Needless to say, education will have to be made available to folks in this area. In this vein we might provide an overview of the types of software that exist for..."
- 19:5719:57, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/The Challenges of Identity Verification in Community Rating Systems No edit summary
- 19:5719:57, 8 September 2024 diff hist +8,820 N Societal optimization Created page with "{{Main|System modeling}} We have discussed optimization as the basis for policymaking in our ratings-based communities. Given its rigorous nature, optimization provides not only an analytical tool by which to measure outcomes, but also a method by which political rancor can be reduced. Not many people will sustain emotional debate when faced with a requirement to produce objective functions. An objective function is simply an equation that tells us what variable we wan..."
- 19:5619:56, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/The Challenges of Identity Verification in Community Rating Systems No edit summary
- 19:5619:56, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4,297 N Systems thinking Created page with "{{Main|System modeling}} If political philosophy is a good required course for building a new society, then an even better one might be system dynamics, sometimes referred to generally as systems thinking. Our discussions of optimization and Pareto fronts presuppose a society well versed in this subject. Systems thinking was pioneered by the computer engineer [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Wright_Forrester Jay Wright Forrester] at MIT. He turned his attention to soc..." current
- 19:5319:53, 8 September 2024 diff hist +6,655 N Multi-criteria decision-making methods Created page with "{{Main|System modeling}} This section primarily addresses the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentially_all_pairwise_rankings_of_all_possible_alternatives PAPRIKA] method by [https://www.1000minds.com/decision-making?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=20315873486&utm_content=150520272373&utm_term=decision%20making%20process%20software&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiArLyuBhA7EiwA-qo80Noemh5EsGq1GMdWy_qRDUBqhRtx8eKfx2DiXutN8BYFwD9w8-HOwhoCyq8QAvD_BwE 1000minds.com]..." current
- 19:5319:53, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Harnessing Collective Intelligence for Informed Decision Making and Positive Societal Change No edit summary
- 19:5119:51, 8 September 2024 diff hist +25 System modeling No edit summary
- 19:4619:46, 8 September 2024 diff hist +1,810 N System modeling Created page with "System modeling as expressed here refers to creating rigorous (ie mathematical to the extent possible) models of society and the effects of proposed policies. The idea is that through diligent modeling, simulation, and optimization we can make better socio-economic decisions without succumbing to futile ideological debate and political rancor. The ratings system will potentially transform society for the better and require a large amount of time from its members. We ant..."
- 19:1419:14, 8 September 2024 diff hist −1 Ratings system No edit summary
- 18:1818:18, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Productivity, Debate, and Trust in a Ratings Based Society No edit summary
- 16:3316:33, 8 September 2024 diff hist +25 Logic No edit summary current
- 16:3016:30, 8 September 2024 diff hist +5 Internal:FromGitlab/More argument mapping tools and proposed ideas for our own such tool No edit summary current
- 16:3016:30, 8 September 2024 diff hist +13,486 N More argument mapping tools and proposed ideas for our own such tool Created page with "{{Main|Logic}} Last time we reviewed [https://carneades.github.io/ Carneades], an academic argument mapping tool/language. Here we will review some more such tools and propose an argument mapping system for our purposes within a trust network. <h3>[Argdown](https://argdown.org/)</h3> Argdown is a markdown system for making arguments and creating debates. It has a graphical visualizer w..."
- 16:2916:29, 8 September 2024 diff hist +5 Internal:FromGitlab/Software for Argumentation IBM Project Debater & Carneades No edit summary current
- 16:2916:29, 8 September 2024 diff hist +17,059 N Software for argumention -- IBM Project Debater and Carneades Created page with "{{Main|Logic}} <h3>IBM Project Debater API</h3> IBM maintains an [https://early-access-program.debater.res.ibm.com/ “early access program” for Project Debater] which includes a Python API. You must login as Guest and accept the agreement before getting access. The following installation procedure was followed: <pre>$ pip install debater-python-api $ pip install tqdm (not included in above install for whatever reason)</pre> Upon attempting to run one of the exam..." current
- 16:2916:29, 8 September 2024 diff hist +5 Internal:FromGitlab/Informal Logic and Fallacies No edit summary current
- 16:2816:28, 8 September 2024 diff hist +50,164 N Informal logic and fallacies Created page with "{{Main|Logic}} <span id="informal-logic"></span> == Informal Logic == Most informal logic is based on analyzing arguments, written in plain English, for known fallacies. Fallacies can occur in all types of arguments (deductive, inductive, abductive) but in deductive arguments a fallacy is regarded as an invalid argument, equivalent to a math mistake which can be established using the rules of inference and equivalence discussed before Internal:FromGitlab/Deductive_&_..."
- 16:2716:27, 8 September 2024 diff hist +5 Internal:FromGitlab/Deductive & Inductive Arguments and Use Cases No edit summary current
- 16:2716:27, 8 September 2024 diff hist +24,457 N Deductive & inductive arguments and use cases Created page with "{{Main|Logic}} <h2>Deductive Arguments and Use Cases</h2> Deductive arguments are ones where the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. They can be reduced to symbolic form and proven in the same way that we prove math theorems. They aren’t as common as inductive arguments (more on those later) but they form the foundation for all arguments and have significant applications of their own. Let’s take an example of a deductive argument that might be used i..."
- 16:2616:26, 8 September 2024 diff hist +5 Internal:FromGitlab/Prolog for Deductive Proofs No edit summary current
- 16:2516:25, 8 September 2024 diff hist +8,413 N Prolog for deductive proofs Created page with "{{Main|Logic}} <h2>Intro to Prolog</h2> SWI-Prolog was used here, from which the 64-bit Windows version was installed. Versions for Linux and other OS’s exist. It is distributed with the Simplified BSD license. https://www.swi-prolog.org/ SWI Prolog presents the user with a command prompt in which to enter queries and an editor for entering facts. Any editor can be used but the built-in one offers some syntax highlighting. After saving an edited file use the followi..."
- 16:2516:25, 8 September 2024 diff hist +16 Thoughts on symbolic logic to assess the truth of arguments No edit summary current
- 16:2416:24, 8 September 2024 diff hist +16 More methods for propositional logic, syllogistic logic, and quantificational logic No edit summary
- 16:2416:24, 8 September 2024 diff hist +5 Internal:FromGitlab/More methods for Propositional logic, Syllogistic logic, and Quantificational Logic No edit summary current
- 16:2316:23, 8 September 2024 diff hist +19,809 N More methods for propositional logic, syllogistic logic, and quantificational logic Created page with "<h2>Other ways to establish truth in propositional logic</h2> <h3>The short truth table method</h3> As we saw last time, the truth table method requires <math display="inline">2^n</math> rows to complete an analysis of any propositional argument. Clearly this becomes untenable as the number of variables <math display="inline">n</math> increases. One simpler technique is to work backward..."
- 16:2316:23, 8 September 2024 diff hist +5 Internal:FromGitlab/Thoughts on Symbolic Logic to Assess the Truth of Arguments No edit summary current
- 16:2216:22, 8 September 2024 diff hist +11,160 N Thoughts on symbolic logic to assess the truth of arguments Created page with "<h2>Assessing validity using propositional logic</h2> Symbolic logic can be used to assess the validity of arguments without distracting, or even deceiving, ourselves with English verbiage. Here we will confine ourselves to propositional logic in which propositions (or statements) have a truth value and can be combined together to form conclusions. Let’s look at an example: P1) John is at the Library or he is Studying (L or S, ie <math display="inline">L \lor S</mat..."
- 16:1516:15, 8 September 2024 diff hist +1,520 Logic No edit summary
- 15:4415:44, 8 September 2024 diff hist +189 N Logic Created page with "One of the central goals of the ratings system is to help people think better. Logic is a fundamental aspect of that, along with having reliable factual information."
- 15:2115:21, 8 September 2024 diff hist +28 Internal:FromGitlab/Trust in Argument Scoring and Rhetorical vs Practical Arguments No edit summary current
- 15:1315:13, 8 September 2024 diff hist −3 Internal:FromGitlab/Argument Scoring No edit summary current
- 15:0215:02, 8 September 2024 diff hist −1 Internal:FromGitlab/Argument Scoring No edit summary
- 15:0015:00, 8 September 2024 diff hist −21 Internal:FromGitlab/Argument Scoring No edit summary
- 14:5614:56, 8 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Notes on the interface and some thoughts on evaluating arguments No edit summary
7 September 2024
- 21:2821:28, 7 September 2024 diff hist +25 Privacy, identity, and fraud in the ratings system No edit summary
- 21:2521:25, 7 September 2024 diff hist +10 Privacy differences between the subjective and community ratings system No edit summary