More actions
m Pete moved page Economic Systems to Economic systems without leaving a redirect |
m Pywikibot 9.3.1 |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Main|Ratings system}} |
{{Main|Ratings system}} |
||
Economic systems refer to methods by which resource allocation occurs as a result of the [[ratings system]]. In particular, the ratings system should make possible the [[Democratizing resource allocation|democratization of resource allocation]]. Using the system, people will rate each other's claims to economic goods based on multiple factors such as their [[productivity]], needs, overall rating, etc. Since the ratings system has both a [[The subjective and community ratings system|subjective and community version]], we distinguish two types of economic system, the [[SRBE and CRBE]] (subjective and [[community]] ratings based economy). The [[Thoughts on a subjective ratings based economy|SRBE]] would be the default since it is based on a subjective ratings system, although its [[Thoughts on an intentional community with a subjective ratings based economy|integration into an intentional community]] is also considered. The CRBE forms a large part of the discussion here since the presence of a community is assumed. However, both systems lead to egalitarian economic outcomes and the [[Thoughts on a subjective ratings based economy|SRBE]] has the benefit of growing organically out of the completely decentralized subjective ratings system. |
Economic systems refer to methods by which [[Resource allocation|resource allocation]] occurs as a result of the [[ratings system]]. In particular, the ratings system should make possible the [[Democratizing resource allocation|democratization of resource allocation]]. Using the system, people will rate each other's claims to economic goods based on multiple factors such as their [[productivity]], needs, overall rating, etc. Since the ratings system has both a [[The subjective and community ratings system|subjective and community version]], we distinguish two types of economic system, the [[SRBE and CRBE]] (subjective and [[community]] ratings based economy). The [[Thoughts on a subjective ratings based economy|SRBE]] would be the default since it is based on a subjective ratings system, although its [[Thoughts on an intentional community with a subjective ratings based economy|integration into an intentional community]] is also considered. The CRBE forms a large part of the discussion here since the presence of a community is assumed. However, both systems lead to [[Hippy communes, socialism, work, and egalitarianism|egalitarian economic outcomes]] and the [[Thoughts on a subjective ratings based economy|SRBE]] has the benefit of growing organically out of the completely decentralized subjective ratings system. |
||
Another related and fundamental distinction is between a [[Money system based on ratings|moneyed]] and a [[Moneyless economy based on reputation and need|moneyless]] economic system. Either approach is possible or some combination of the two. We note, however, that the ratings system and attendant software should provide a feasible alternative to money and eliminate its corrupting influence. The SRBE, in particular, would probably work better in a moneyless system. |
Another related and fundamental distinction is between a [[Money system based on ratings|moneyed]] and a [[Moneyless economy based on reputation and need|moneyless]] economic system. Either approach is possible or some combination of the two. We note, however, that the ratings system and attendant software should provide a feasible alternative to money and eliminate its corrupting influence. The SRBE, in particular, would probably work better in a moneyless system. |
||
We begin by outlining some ideas by which [[economic predicates]] in a ratings system could work. These are the questions that people would be rated on which would influence their ability to fulfill economic claims. One of these, productivity is highly relevant to judging not only "deservingness" but also economic performance writ large. We might also, alongside these concepts, try to understand [[Personal choice and sacrificial contributions|personal economic choices and sacrificial contributions]], ones that are difficult to place in a traditional self-interested economic context. |
We begin by outlining some ideas by which [[economic predicates]] in a ratings system could work. These are the questions that people would be rated on which would influence their ability to fulfill [[Money defined|economic claims]]. One of these, [[Productivity|productivity]] is highly relevant to judging not only "deservingness" but also [[Societal optimization|economic performance]] writ large. We might also, alongside these concepts, try to understand [[Personal choice and sacrificial contributions|personal economic choices and sacrificial contributions]], ones that are difficult to place in a traditional self-interested economic context. |
||
Since we highlight egalitarian economic systems, we might take a look at the [[Hippy |
Since we highlight egalitarian economic systems, we might take a look at the [[Hippy communes, socialism, work, and egalitarianism|history of such systems]] in [[Contemporary society|contemporary society]]. Of particular interest is their ability to incentivize productive work. Speaking of productivity, we note that participation in the ratings system will be part of everyone's "job", at least in the [[The subjective and community ratings system|community-based system (as opposed to the subjective system)]]. As such members may be [[Compensation for participants|compensated]] depending on the distribution of [[Optimal income distribution|income rules]], their rating, productivity, and so on. |
||
Making good economic decisions is closely tied to [[System modeling|system modeling]]. Our goal is to help communities clearly understand economic policy choices and avoid [[Economic losses and counterfactuals|economic loss]]. |
Making good economic decisions is closely tied to [[System modeling|system modeling]]. Our goal is to help communities clearly understand economic policy choices and avoid [[Economic losses and counterfactuals|economic loss]]. |
||
The backdrop for all these ideas is the [[Influence of wealth in democracy|influence of wealth]] in contemporary society, particularly on how it erodes democratic principles. We envision communities based on the ratings system to have transparent economic systems with democratically defined rules and a built-in enforcement mechanism. |
The backdrop for all these ideas is the [[Influence of wealth in democracy|influence of wealth]] in contemporary society, particularly on how it erodes democratic principles. We envision communities based on the ratings system to have transparent economic systems with democratically defined rules and a built-in [[Enforcement mechanisms|enforcement mechanism]]. |
Latest revision as of 18:59, 16 October 2024
Main article: Ratings system
Economic systems refer to methods by which resource allocation occurs as a result of the ratings system. In particular, the ratings system should make possible the democratization of resource allocation. Using the system, people will rate each other's claims to economic goods based on multiple factors such as their productivity, needs, overall rating, etc. Since the ratings system has both a subjective and community version, we distinguish two types of economic system, the SRBE and CRBE (subjective and community ratings based economy). The SRBE would be the default since it is based on a subjective ratings system, although its integration into an intentional community is also considered. The CRBE forms a large part of the discussion here since the presence of a community is assumed. However, both systems lead to egalitarian economic outcomes and the SRBE has the benefit of growing organically out of the completely decentralized subjective ratings system.
Another related and fundamental distinction is between a moneyed and a moneyless economic system. Either approach is possible or some combination of the two. We note, however, that the ratings system and attendant software should provide a feasible alternative to money and eliminate its corrupting influence. The SRBE, in particular, would probably work better in a moneyless system.
We begin by outlining some ideas by which economic predicates in a ratings system could work. These are the questions that people would be rated on which would influence their ability to fulfill economic claims. One of these, productivity is highly relevant to judging not only "deservingness" but also economic performance writ large. We might also, alongside these concepts, try to understand personal economic choices and sacrificial contributions, ones that are difficult to place in a traditional self-interested economic context.
Since we highlight egalitarian economic systems, we might take a look at the history of such systems in contemporary society. Of particular interest is their ability to incentivize productive work. Speaking of productivity, we note that participation in the ratings system will be part of everyone's "job", at least in the community-based system (as opposed to the subjective system). As such members may be compensated depending on the distribution of income rules, their rating, productivity, and so on.
Making good economic decisions is closely tied to system modeling. Our goal is to help communities clearly understand economic policy choices and avoid economic loss.
The backdrop for all these ideas is the influence of wealth in contemporary society, particularly on how it erodes democratic principles. We envision communities based on the ratings system to have transparent economic systems with democratically defined rules and a built-in enforcement mechanism.