More actions
12 September 2024
- 21:0821:08, 12 September 2024 diff hist −5 Justice and defense in communities No edit summary
- 21:0621:06, 12 September 2024 diff hist +21,299 N Justice and defense in communities Created page with "{{Main|Ratings system}} ==Thoughts on justice== It is not a happy thought but there is and will be criminal behavior in all societies. Our idea is that the ratings system will temper this to a large extent since it wouldn’t be possible to “get away” with alot of bad behavior. The criminal would be exposed to more than just a supportive friend-group. It is also the case that people with a tendency toward bad behavior might be more easily identified early-on throug..."
- 21:0621:06, 12 September 2024 diff hist +8 Internal:FromGitlab/Ratings Based Society: Economics, Justice, and Defense No edit summary
- 21:0321:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist −6 Community →Steps in Community Building
- 21:0221:02, 12 September 2024 diff hist +66 Community No edit summary
- 20:5820:58, 12 September 2024 diff hist −6,784 Community No edit summary
- 20:3920:39, 12 September 2024 diff hist +145 Economic losses and counterfactuals No edit summary
- 20:3320:33, 12 September 2024 diff hist +228 Economic systems No edit summary
- 20:2720:27, 12 September 2024 diff hist −1 Economic losses and counterfactuals No edit summary
- 20:2520:25, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Balancing Trust and Liberty: The Future of Ratings Systems No edit summary
- 20:2520:25, 12 September 2024 diff hist 0 Economic losses and counterfactuals No edit summary
- 20:2520:25, 12 September 2024 diff hist +3,936 N Economic losses and counterfactuals Created page with "{{Main|Economic systems}} {{Main|Systems thinking}} $5.9 billion is a lot of money but probably no one actually “felt” the loss. This is usually the case with financial fraud. If someone robs our bank, we do not personally feel the effect of that. For one thing, the FDIC insures our accounts so the loss is only felt collectively. But another problem, obviously, is that much of what counts as a loss is only measurable in the future. In other words, the loss is the d..."
- 20:2320:23, 12 September 2024 diff hist +154 System modeling No edit summary
- 20:1520:15, 12 September 2024 diff hist +48 Economic systems No edit summary
- 20:0920:09, 12 September 2024 diff hist −98 Weight assignment -- The equal weight method No edit summary
- 20:0320:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Revolutionizing Governance through Continuous Rating and Trust Networks No edit summary
- 20:0320:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist +5,364 N Weight assignment -- The equal weight method Created page with "{{Main|Ratings system}} In our last meeting (7/3/2024) we discussed methods for delegating trust weights. Dan’s preferred system is to give everyone 100 points to dole out as they see fit. You can spend points on other people and accumulate points spent on you from other people. One question that came up is whether you could spend the points you were given by others. The consensus seemed to be that yes, you could. If you accumulated say, 500 points, you could proxy it..."
- 20:0220:02, 12 September 2024 diff hist +193 Ratings system No edit summary
- 19:3519:35, 12 September 2024 diff hist −606 The subjective and community ratings system No edit summary
- 19:1819:18, 12 September 2024 diff hist −47 The subjective and community ratings system No edit summary
- 19:1419:14, 12 September 2024 diff hist +8 Internal:FromGitlab/Revolutionizing Governance through Continuous Rating and Trust Networks No edit summary
- 19:1419:14, 12 September 2024 diff hist +16,903 N The subjective and community ratings system Created page with "{{Main|Ratings system}} === The subjective and community-based ratings system === Let's begin by stressing that first we are building a subjective ratings system in the context of a peer-to-peer network. Everyone would have their own network of contacts, choose their own categories for ratings, algorithms for aggregation, weights for aggregation equations, etc. Individuals would identify themselves to their peers of choice with a public key or similar methodology. T..."
- 19:0319:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist −1 Ratings system No edit summary
- 19:0319:03, 12 September 2024 diff hist +496 Ratings system No edit summary
- 18:4118:41, 12 September 2024 diff hist −10 Ratings system No edit summary
- 16:1016:10, 12 September 2024 diff hist +38 Ideas for encryption in aggregators No edit summary current
- 16:0916:09, 12 September 2024 diff hist −73 Aggregation techniques No edit summary
- 16:0616:06, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Revolutionizing Governance through Continuous Rating and Trust Networks No edit summary
- 16:0516:05, 12 September 2024 diff hist −1 Aggregation techniques No edit summary
- 16:0516:05, 12 September 2024 diff hist +1,369 Aggregation techniques No edit summary
- 15:4715:47, 12 September 2024 diff hist +3 Freedom of speech No edit summary
- 15:4515:45, 12 September 2024 diff hist −125 Freedom of speech No edit summary
- 15:3715:37, 12 September 2024 diff hist +35 Freedom of speech No edit summary
- 15:3515:35, 12 September 2024 diff hist +20 Internal:Brainstorming 27 – Freedom of speech, cont., smart people, progress moving to Main namespace No edit summary
- 15:3515:35, 12 September 2024 diff hist +15,508 N Freedom of speech Created page with "Last week, Leo asked whether our ratings system requires freedom of speech. The answer is yes, but perhaps we’ve been too quick to assume that. Freedom of speech is a complex subject because, even in the most free societies, there are restrictions. Dan mentioned perhaps the most important of them, defamation. Fortunately the ratings system has a built-in mechanism to oppose those who slander others. We have, incidentally, discussed having a separate legal framework to..."
- 15:3415:34, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:Brainstorming 26 -- Freedom of speech, sanitizing status, progress moving to Main namespace No edit summary current
- 15:3215:32, 12 September 2024 diff hist +141 Political systems No edit summary
- 15:2115:21, 12 September 2024 diff hist +25 Commentary on technology and feasibility of the ratings system No edit summary
- 15:1815:18, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Harnessing Collective Intelligence for Informed Decision Making and Positive Societal Change No edit summary current
- 15:1815:18, 12 September 2024 diff hist +2,330 N Commentary on technology and feasibility of the ratings system Created page with "The system we are proposing is far-reaching and may strike many as unrealistically grandiose. But it is also unrealistic to doubt the impact of technology. Consider that today our mobile technology, in particular, has wrought a type of dystopian present where everyone is addicted to their phones. I was looking at students at a bus stop not long ago and every single one of them was immersed in their phone. It reminded me of a Star Trek TNG episode from decades ago where e..."
- 15:1715:17, 12 September 2024 diff hist +174 Ratings system No edit summary
- 15:0915:09, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Productivity, Debate, and Trust in a Ratings Based Society No edit summary current
- 15:0815:08, 12 September 2024 diff hist +6,208 N Thoughts on trust Created page with "{{Main|Trust}} Trust can be looked upon as the probability of an interaction with someone having an expected favorable outcome. This might mean they tell the truth when asked a question. Or it might mean they don’t cheat you in a financial transaction. The outcome must be expected because normally we don’t count on random outcomes, even if they are favorable. And the outcome must be favorable because that is, presumably, the reason for the interaction in the first p..." current
- 15:0715:07, 12 September 2024 diff hist +22 Trust No edit summary
- 14:5714:57, 12 September 2024 diff hist −64 SRBE and CRBE No edit summary
- 14:5414:54, 12 September 2024 diff hist 0 Economic systems No edit summary
- 14:5414:54, 12 September 2024 diff hist +14 Economic systems No edit summary
- 14:5114:51, 12 September 2024 diff hist 0 SRBE and CRBE No edit summary
- 14:5114:51, 12 September 2024 diff hist +4 Internal:FromGitlab/Balancing Community, Individual Freedom, and Economic Progress in a Ratings Based Economy No edit summary current
- 14:5114:51, 12 September 2024 diff hist +1,246 N SRBE and CRBE Created page with "{{Main|Economic systems}} Last time we clarified some terms with regard to Lem’s “gift-giving” economy. We will call it instead the Subjective Ratings Based Economy (SRBE). In this economy, we use each individual’s personal ratings system to evaluate economic “deservingness” of claims. My alternative to this would be to vote on a ratings system that the community would use for handling economic claims and “deservingness”. We might call this a Community R..."