Toggle menu
122
332
11
3.4K
Information Rating System Wiki
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Economic systems: Difference between revisions

From Information Rating System Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Pete (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Pete (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
We begin by outlining some ideas by which [[economic predicates]] in a [[ratings system]] could work. These are the questions that people would be rated on which would influence their ability to fulfill economic claims. One of these, [[productivity]] is highly relevant to judging not only "deservingness" but also economic performance writ large. We might also, alongside these concepts, try to understand [[Personal choice and sacrificial contributions|personal economic choices and sacrificial contributions]], ones that are difficult to place in a traditional self-interested economic context.
We begin by outlining some ideas by which [[economic predicates]] in a [[ratings system]] could work. These are the questions that people would be rated on which would influence their ability to fulfill economic claims. One of these, [[productivity]] is highly relevant to judging not only "deservingness" but also economic performance writ large. We might also, alongside these concepts, try to understand [[Personal choice and sacrificial contributions|personal economic choices and sacrificial contributions]], ones that are difficult to place in a traditional self-interested economic context.


Since we openly advocate an egalitarian economic system, we might take a look at the [[Hippy Communes, Socialism, Work, and Egalitarianism|history of such systems]] in contemporary society. Of particular interest is their ability to incentivize productive work. Speaking of [[productivity]], we note that participation in the [[ratings system]] will be part of everyone's "job", at least in the [[community]] based system (as opposed to the subjective system). But participants will generally [[Compensation for participants|not be compensated]] in the traditional sense.
Since we openly advocate an egalitarian economic system, we might take a look at the [[Hippy Communes, Socialism, Work, and Egalitarianism|history of such systems]] in contemporary society. Of particular interest is their ability to incentivize productive work. Speaking of [[productivity]], we note that participation in the [[ratings system]] will be part of everyone's "job", at least in the [[community]] based system (as opposed to the subjective system). As such members may be [[Compensation for participants|compensated]] depending on the distribution of income rules, their rating, [[productivity]], and so on.


The backdrop for all these ideas is the [[influence of wealth]] in contemporary society, particularly on how it erodes democratic principles.
The backdrop for all these ideas is the [[influence of wealth]] in contemporary society, particularly on how it erodes democratic principles. We envision commumities based on the [[ratings system]] to have transparent economic systems with democratically defined rules and a built-in enforcement mechanism.

Revision as of 14:50, 29 August 2024

Economic systems refer to methods by which resource allocation occurs as a result of the ratings system. Using the system, people will rate each other's claims to economic goods based on multiple factors such as their productivity, needs, overall rating, etc. Since the ratings system has both a subjective and community version, we distinguish two types of economic system, the SRBE (Subjective Ratings Based Economy) and CRBE (Community Ratings Based Economy). Another related and fundamental distinction is between a moneyed and a moneyless economic system.

We begin by outlining some ideas by which economic predicates in a ratings system could work. These are the questions that people would be rated on which would influence their ability to fulfill economic claims. One of these, productivity is highly relevant to judging not only "deservingness" but also economic performance writ large. We might also, alongside these concepts, try to understand personal economic choices and sacrificial contributions, ones that are difficult to place in a traditional self-interested economic context.

Since we openly advocate an egalitarian economic system, we might take a look at the history of such systems in contemporary society. Of particular interest is their ability to incentivize productive work. Speaking of productivity, we note that participation in the ratings system will be part of everyone's "job", at least in the community based system (as opposed to the subjective system). As such members may be compensated depending on the distribution of income rules, their rating, productivity, and so on.

The backdrop for all these ideas is the influence of wealth in contemporary society, particularly on how it erodes democratic principles. We envision commumities based on the ratings system to have transparent economic systems with democratically defined rules and a built-in enforcement mechanism.