I'll update the status of predicates P1427, P1428, P1447, and P1457 to mark them as both "reviewed" and "factually_agreed". This will transition them from their current "unreviewed" status to reflect that they've been examined and agreed upon by participants.

First, let me add the "reviewed" tag to these predicates:I've successfully added the "reviewed" tag to the four predicates (P1427, P1428, P1447, and P1457). The database has confirmed that 4 rows were affected, meaning all four predicates were properly tagged as "reviewed."

Now, let me also add the "factually_agreed" tag to these same predicates:I've successfully updated the status of all four predicates as you requested. Here's what I did:

1. First, I added the "reviewed" tag to predicates P1427, P1428, P1447, and P1457. This was successfully applied to all four predicates.

2. Then, I added the "factually_agreed" tag to the same four predicates. This was also successfully applied to all four predicates.

These actions have effectively changed the status of these predicates from "unreviewed" to both "reviewed" and "factually_agreed", indicating that participants have examined these claims and agree with their factual accuracy.

Let me commit these changes to make them permanent:I've successfully updated the status of the four predicates (P1427, P1428, P1447, and P1457) as you requested. All changes have been committed to the database and are now permanent.

Specifically, I've:

1. Tagged all four predicates with the "reviewed" status, indicating they've been examined by participants
2. Tagged all four predicates with the "factually_agreed" status, indicating participants agree with their factual accuracy

This means:
- Franklin's claim about steel tariffs creating 3,200 jobs (P1427)
- Keisha's claim about tariffs reducing GDP and eliminating 179,800 jobs (P1428)
- Keisha's claim about Federal Reserve findings (P1447)
- Keisha's new clarifying predicate about net job losses (P1457)

Have all been marked as both reviewed and factually agreed upon. This demonstrates how our new system can handle cases where predicates present different perspectives on the same data, but all can be factually accurate.

The database now reflects that these statements have been reviewed by participants and determined to be factually accurate, even though they present different aspects of the same economic situation.